Kan, Rebecca L.D., Xu, Grace X.J., Shu, Kate T., Lai, Frank, Kranz, Gottfried and Kranz, Georg S. (2022) Effects of non-invasive brain stimulation in multiple sclerosis: systematic review and meta-analysis. Therapeutic Advances in Chronic Disease, 13. pp. 1-21. ISSN 2040-6223
|
Text
20406223211069198.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial 4.0. Download (1MB) | Preview |
Abstract
Objective: The objective of this meta-analysis was to summarize evidence on the therapeutic effects of non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) on core symptoms of multiple sclerosis (MS). Specifically, findings from studies deploying transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) protocols were summarized in this review. Methods: We systematically searched articles published in four databases, until 31 May 2021, which compared the effects of active tDCS or rTMS with sham intervention in MS patients. We used a random-effects model for this meta-analysis. Meta-regression and subgroup meta-analysis were used to examine the effects of stimulation dose and different stimulation protocols, respectively. Results: Twenty-five randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included in this review, consisting of 19 tDCS and 6 rTMS studies. tDCS led to a significant and immediate reduction of fatigue with a large effect size (Hedges’s g = −0.870, 95% confidence intervals (CI) = [−1.225 to −0.458], number needed to treat (NNT) = 2). Particularly, a subgroup analysis showed that applying tDCS over the left DLPFC and bilateral S1 led to fatigue reductions compared to sham stimulation. Furthermore, tDCS had favorable effects on fatigue in MS patients with low physical disability but not those with high physical disability, and additionally improved cognitive function. Finally, whereas rTMS was observed to reduce muscle spasticity, these NIBS protocols showed no further effect on MS-associated pain and mood symptoms. Conclusion: tDCS in MS alleviates fatigue and improves cognitive function whereas rTMS reduces muscle spasticity. More high-quality studies are needed to substantiate the therapeutic effects of different NIBS protocols in MS.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Additional Information: | Funding information: The authors disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This research was supported by the Hong Kong Research Grants Council (project no. 25100219 and 15100120) to Georg S. Kranz. |
Uncontrolled Keywords: | multiple sclerosis, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, transcranial direct current stimulation, fatigue, meta-analysis |
Subjects: | A300 Clinical Medicine |
Department: | Faculties > Health and Life Sciences > Social Work, Education and Community Wellbeing |
Depositing User: | John Coen |
Date Deposited: | 04 Feb 2022 11:39 |
Last Modified: | 04 Feb 2022 11:45 |
URI: | http://nrl.northumbria.ac.uk/id/eprint/48367 |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year