Thomas, Rod (2022) Reply to Arne Heise's ‘The incommensurability of Keynes's and Walrasian economics and the unsuccessful escape from old ideas'. Economic Thought, 10 (2). pp. 20-27. ISSN 2055-6314
Text
SecondReply to Arne Heise - Purecopy.pdf - Accepted Version Restricted to Repository staff only Download (850kB) | Request a copy |
Official URL: http://et.worldeconomicsassociation.org/papers/rep...
Abstract
I thank Arne Heise for his commentary on my debate with Mark Pernecky and Paul Wojick (Pernecky and Wojick, 2019, 2020; Thomas, 2020). Here, I offer a reply to some of its content.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Subjects: | L100 Economics V500 Philosophy |
Department: | Faculties > Business and Law > Newcastle Business School |
Depositing User: | John Coen |
Date Deposited: | 17 Mar 2022 12:34 |
Last Modified: | 18 Mar 2022 11:56 |
URI: | http://nrl.northumbria.ac.uk/id/eprint/48685 |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year