“Nature's contributions to people” and peoples' moral obligations to nature

Piccolo, John J., Taylor, Bron, Washington, Haydn, Kopnina, Helen, Gray, Joe, Alberro, Heather and Orlikowska, Ewa (2022) “Nature's contributions to people” and peoples' moral obligations to nature. Biological Conservation, 270. p. 109572. ISSN 0006-3207

1-s2.0-S0006320722001252-main.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.

Download (1MB) | Preview
Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2022.109572


The Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) has become influential in biodiversity conservation. Its research is published widely and has been adopted by the United Nations and the Convention for Biological Diversity. This platform includes discussion about how values relate to biodiversity conservation. The IPBES emphasizes “relational values”, connecting these with living a “good life,” and “nature's contributions to people” (NCP); building upon ecosystem services (ES), which have dominated nature valuation for 15+ years. Although the IPBES acknowledges instrumental and intrinsic natural values, they purport that by adopting relational values, conservation will become more socially- and culturally- inclusive, moving beyond the “unhelpful dichotomy” between instrumental and intrinsic values. We wholeheartedly agree that conservation should become more inclusive – it should, in fact, morally include nonhuman nature. We argue that far from being half of an unhelpful dichotomy, intrinsic natural values are incontrovertible elements of any honest effort to sustain Earth's biodiversity. We find NCP to be mainly anthropocentric, and relational values to be largely instrumental. The “good life” they support is a good life for humans, and not for nonhuman beings or collectives. While passingly acknowledging intrinsic natural values, the current IPBES platform gives little attention to these, and to corresponding ecocentric worldviews. In this paper we demonstrate the important practical implications of operationalizing intrinsic values for conservation, such as ecological justice, i.e., “peoples' obligations to nature”. We urge the IPBES platform, in their future values work, to become much more inclusive of intrinsic values and ecocentrism.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: Intrinsic value, Ecocentrism, Relational value, Anthropocentrism, Ecological justice, Rights of nature
Subjects: F900 Others in Physical Sciences
Department: Faculties > Business and Law > Newcastle Business School
Depositing User: John Coen
Date Deposited: 20 May 2022 10:18
Last Modified: 20 May 2022 10:30
URI: http://nrl.northumbria.ac.uk/id/eprint/49158

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item


Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics