Reliability and Validity of Non-Instrumental Clinical Assessments for Adults with Oropharyngeal Dysphagia: A Systematic Review

Cordier, Reinie, Speyer, Renée, Martinez, Matthew and Parsons, Lauren (2023) Reliability and Validity of Non-Instrumental Clinical Assessments for Adults with Oropharyngeal Dysphagia: A Systematic Review. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 12 (2). p. 721. ISSN 2077-0383

[img]
Preview
Text
jcm-12-00721-v2.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.

Download (1MB) | Preview
Official URL: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12020721

Abstract

This systematic review on non-instrumental clinical assessment in adult oropharyngeal dysphagia (OD) provides an overview of published measures with reported reliability and validity. In alignment with PRISMA, four databases (CINAHL, Embase, PsycINFO, and PubMed) were searched, resulting in a total of 16 measures and 32 psychometric studies included. The included measures assessed any aspect of swallowing, consisted of at least one specific subscale relating to swallowing, were developed by clinical observation, targeted adults, and were developed in English. The included psychometric studies focused on adults, reported on measures for OD-related conditions, described non-instrumental clinical assessments, reported on validity or reliability, and were published in English. Methodological quality was assessed using the standard quality assessment QualSyst. Most measures targeted only restricted subdomains within the conceptual framework of non-instrumental clinical assessments. Across the 16 measures, hypothesis testing and reliability were the most reported psychometrics, whilst structural validity and content validity were the least reported. Overall, data on the reliability and validity of the included measures proved incomplete and frequently did not meet current psychometric standards. Future research should focus on the development of comprehensive non-instrumental clinical assessments for adults with OD using contemporary psychometric research methods.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: Funding information: The research was funded by a seeding grant from Northumbria University grant number 100623-515243.
Uncontrolled Keywords: psychometrics; instrument development; measurement; deglutition; swallowing disorders; internal consistency; hypothesis testing; structural validity; content validity
Subjects: A300 Clinical Medicine
Department: Faculties > Health and Life Sciences > Social Work, Education and Community Wellbeing
Depositing User: Elena Carlaw
Date Deposited: 08 Feb 2023 10:36
Last Modified: 08 Feb 2023 10:45
URI: https://nrl.northumbria.ac.uk/id/eprint/51344

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics