‘Balancing the interference with private and family life of the person whose extradition is sought with the public interest in extradition: Has the pendulum swung too far?’

Davies, Gemma (2015) ‘Balancing the interference with private and family life of the person whose extradition is sought with the public interest in extradition: Has the pendulum swung too far?’. The Journal of Criminal Law, 79 (5). pp. 309-316. ISSN 0022-0183

[img] Text (Full text)
Celinski - GD Final.docx - Accepted Version

Download (29kB)
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022018315605228

Abstract

This case combined six appeals of extradition hearings that had been held under Part 1 of the Extradition Act 2003. In all of the hearings the courts at first instance had heard Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights arguments, taken different factors into account, and made decisions based on proportionality. The issue on appeal was whether the district judge had correctly applied his or her discretion in each case.

Item Type: Article
Subjects: M200 Law by Topic
Department: Faculties > Business and Law > School of Law
Depositing User: Gemma Davies
Date Deposited: 11 Feb 2016 11:09
Last Modified: 03 Nov 2016 13:03
URI: http://nrl.northumbria.ac.uk/id/eprint/25970

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics


Policies: NRL Policies | NRL University Deposit Policy | NRL Deposit Licence