Holt, Gary D. and Goulding, Jack (2017) The "ological-triad": considerations for construction management research. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 15 (3). pp. 286-304. ISSN 1726-0531
Full text not available from this repository. (Request a copy)Abstract
Purpose:
This paper aims to consider an “-ological” (ontological, epistemological and methodological) triad in the context of construction management (CM) research, and to explore the triad in terms of ontological/epistemological viewpoints, paradigmatic approaches to CM research and, ultimately, CM methodological decisions.
Design/methodology/approach:
Derivation of critical narrative and graphical models using literature synthesis combined with experiential, methodological views of the authors.
Findings:
Conceptions of ontology, epistemology and methodology (the “ological-triad”) demonstrate high variability – resultantly, their use in CM research is equally inconsistent, sometimes questionable and, in the extreme, sometimes overlooked. Accordingly, this study concludes that greater recognition of the “ological-triad” is called for in CM research, especially at the design stage. A framework for doing this is proffered.
Originality/value:
Combined study of the “ologies” within CM research uniquely consolidates previous disparate knowledge into a single, cogent, subject-specific discourse that, inter-alia, both informs and illuminates CM research challenges. It also encourages critical debate on the issues highlighted.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Uncontrolled Keywords: | Research, Methodology, Paradigm, Ontology, Epistemology, Worldview |
Subjects: | K900 Others in Architecture, Building and Planning X200 Research and Study Skills in Education |
Department: | Faculties > Engineering and Environment > Architecture and Built Environment |
Depositing User: | Paul Burns |
Date Deposited: | 08 Nov 2017 12:30 |
Last Modified: | 10 Oct 2019 19:00 |
URI: | http://nrl.northumbria.ac.uk/id/eprint/32474 |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year