Consensus on Terminology for Describing Child Language Interventions: A Delphi Study

Denman, Deborah, Kim, Jae-Hyun, Munro, Natalie, Speyer, Renée and Cordier, Reinie (2021) Consensus on Terminology for Describing Child Language Interventions: A Delphi Study. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 64 (9). pp. 3504-3519. ISSN 1092-4388

[img]
Preview
Text
Denman et al 2021 Delphi Study Intervention PREPRINT.pdf - Accepted Version

Download (2MB) | Preview
Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1044/2021_jslhr-20-00656

Abstract

Purpose
Language intervention for children with language disorder may be effective; however, lack of detailed and consistent terminology for describing language interventions poses barriers for advancement within the field. This study aimed to develop consensus from speech-language pathologists (SLPs) in Australia on a taxonomy with terminology for describing language interventions for school-aged children and investigate SLPs' application of taxonomy terminology when describing child language interventions.
Method
A taxonomy with terms for describing interventions was developed with reference to contemporary literature and presented to clinicians and researchers with expertise in child language disorders in a three-round Delphi study. We asked Delphi participants to indicate agreement with the taxonomy or propose changes. Application of the taxonomy was investigated by asking participants to use taxonomy terminology to describe interventions presented in two case studies.
Results
The taxonomy consists of five aspects across which interventions may be described: modality/domain, purpose, delivery, form, and teaching techniques. Consensus on the taxonomy was established in both Round 1 (55 participants) and Round 2 (43 participants), with 100% of SLPs strongly agreeing or agreeing with the overall structure of the taxonomy and at least 87.3% of SLPs strongly agreeing or agreeing with each aspect. In Round 3 (32 participants), consensus was reached on 45/54 taxonomy categories (4/12 of the components) for Case Study 1 and 45/54 taxonomy categories (7/12 of the components) for Case Study 2.
Conclusions
Consensus on a taxonomy with terminology for describing language interventions represents a significant advancement in the field of child language intervention. Future actions may be needed to facilitate consistent application of taxonomy terms. Supplemental Material https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.16435290

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: Funding information: The authors would like to acknowledge that an Australian Government Research Training Program Scholarship supported this research.
Uncontrolled Keywords: Speech and Hearing, Linguistics and Language, Language and Linguistics
Subjects: L500 Social Work
Q100 Linguistics
Department: Faculties > Health and Life Sciences > Social Work, Education and Community Wellbeing
Depositing User: Rachel Branson
Date Deposited: 10 Sep 2021 12:59
Last Modified: 01 Oct 2021 16:14
URI: http://nrl.northumbria.ac.uk/id/eprint/47135

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics