Shepherd, Lee, O’Carroll, Ronan E. and Ferguson, Eamonn (2023) Assessing the Factors that Influence the Donation of a Deceased Family Member’s Organs in an Opt-Out System for Organ Donation. Social Science & Medicine, 317. p. 115545. ISSN 0277-9536
|
Text
1-s2.0-S0277953622008516-main.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution 4.0. Download (816kB) | Preview |
|
|
Text
Accepted manuscript.pdf - Accepted Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives 4.0. Download (342kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Rationale
Family, and sometimes longstanding friends, have considerable influence over organ donation, through agreeing or disagreeing to the donation of a deceased individual's organs. To date, most research has been undertaken within opt-in systems.
Objective
This study advances on previous research by assessing next-of-kin approval under opt-out legislation. We tested whether next-of-kin approval varies when the deceased is a registered donor (opted-in), registered non-donor (opted-out) or has not registered a decision under an opt-out policy (deemed consent). We also tested if the deceased's wishes influenced next-of-kin approval through relatives anticipating regret for not donating and feelings of uncertainty. Finally, we assessed whether next-of-kin's own beliefs about organ donation influenced whether they followed the deceased's wishes.
Methods
Participants (N = 848) living in a country with opt-out legislation (Wales, UK) were asked to imagine a relative had died under an opt-out system and decided if their relatives' organs should be donated. Participants were randomly allocated to imagine the deceased had either (i) opted-in, (ii) opted-out or (iii) not registered a decision (deemed consent). The outcome variable was next-of-kin approval, with uncertainty and anticipated regret as potential mediators and next-of-kin's beliefs about organ donation as moderators.
Results
Next-of-kin approval was lower when the deceased had opted-out than under deemed consent. This was due to next-of-kin anticipating more regret for not donating under deemed consent than opt-out. Further analyses revealed the deceased's wishes influence next-of-kin approval, via anticipated regret, when next-of-kin did not hold negative beliefs about organ donation.
Conclusions
The deceased's wishes were less likely to be followed when next-of-kin had negative beliefs towards donation. Developing large-scale campaigns to improve these beliefs in the general public should make people more likely to follow the deceased's wishes. As a result, these campaigns should improve the availability of donor organs.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Additional Information: | Funding information: This research was funded by a British Academy/Leverhulme Small Research Grant (SRG1819\191190). This funding source did not influence the study design, data collection and analysis, interpretation or writing of this article. |
Uncontrolled Keywords: | Next-of-kin, organ donation, transplantation, affective attitudes, perceived benefits, anticipated regret, uncertainty, Wales (UK) |
Subjects: | A300 Clinical Medicine B100 Anatomy, Physiology and Pathology C800 Psychology |
Department: | Faculties > Health and Life Sciences > Psychology |
Depositing User: | Rachel Branson |
Date Deposited: | 14 Nov 2022 15:55 |
Last Modified: | 17 Nov 2023 03:30 |
URI: | https://nrl.northumbria.ac.uk/id/eprint/50647 |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year