Honekopp, Johannes and Kleber, Janet (2008) Sometimes the impact factor outshines the H index. Retrovirology, 5 (88). ISSN 1742-4690
|
PDF (Article)
Retrovirology_2008.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (210kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Journal impact factor (which reflects a particular journal's quality) and H index (which reflects the number and quality of an author's publications) are two measures of research quality. It has been argued that the H index outperforms the impact factor for evaluation purposes. Using articles first-authored or last-authored by board members of Retrovirology, we show here that the reverse is true when the future success of an article is to be predicted. The H index proved unsuitable for this specific task because, surprisingly, an article's odds of becoming a 'hit' appear independent of the pre-eminence of its author. We discuss implications for the peer-review process.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Uncontrolled Keywords: | research impact, periodicals quality assurance |
Subjects: | C800 Psychology |
Department: | Faculties > Health and Life Sciences > Psychology |
Depositing User: | EPrint Services |
Date Deposited: | 18 Mar 2010 14:57 |
Last Modified: | 17 Dec 2023 16:51 |
URI: | https://nrl.northumbria.ac.uk/id/eprint/749 |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year