How diverse are the samples used in the journals 'Evolution & Human Behavior' and 'Evolutionary Psychology'?

Pollet, Thomas and Saxton, Tamsin (2019) How diverse are the samples used in the journals 'Evolution & Human Behavior' and 'Evolutionary Psychology'? Evolutionary Psychological Science, 5 (3). pp. 357-368. ISSN 2198-9885

[img]
Preview
Text (Final published version)
Pollet-Saxton2019_Article_HowDiverseAreTheSamplesUsedInT.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.

Download (704kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text (Advance online version)
Pollet-Saxton2019_Article_HowDiverseAreTheSamplesUsedInT.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.

Download (738kB) | Preview
[img] Text
Pollet, Saxton - How diverse are the samples used AAM.docx - Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.

Download (607kB)
Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40806-019-00192-2

Abstract

Psychologists regularly draw inferences about populations based on data from small samples of people, and so have long been interested in how well those samples generalise to wider populations. There is a consensus that psychology probably relies too much on samples from Western Educated Industrialised Rich and Democratic (WEIRD) societies, and among those from university students. Online surveys might be used to increase sample diversity, although online sampling still reaches only a restricted range of participants. Studies from evolutionary psychology often seek to uncover aspects of evolved universal characteristics, and so might demonstrate a particular interest in the use of diverse samples. Here, we empirically examine the samples used in the 2015-2016 volumes of ‘Evolution & Human Behavior’ (104 articles) and ‘Evolutionary Psychology’ (76 articles). Our database consists of 311 samples of humans (median sample size = 186). The majority of samples were either online or student samples (70% of samples), followed by other adult Western samples (19%). 253 (81%) of the samples were classified as ‘Western’ (Europe/North America/Australia). The remaining samples were predominantly from Asia (N= 37; 12%, mostly Japan). Only a small fraction of the samples was taken from Latin American and Caribbean (N = 8) or African (N = 6) countries. The median sample size did not differ significantly between continents, but online samples (both paid and unpaid) were typically larger than samples sourced offline. It seems that the samples used are more diverse than those that have been reported in reviews of the literature from social and developmental psychology, perhaps because evolutionary psychology has a greater inherent need to test hypotheses about an evolved and universal human nature. However, it is also apparent that the majority of samples within contemporary evolutionary psychology research remain WEIRD.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: Cross-cultural samples; WEIRD; sampling; participants
Subjects: C800 Psychology
X200 Research and Study Skills in Education
Department: Faculties > Health and Life Sciences > Psychology
Depositing User: Paul Burns
Date Deposited: 04 Mar 2019 10:43
Last Modified: 11 Oct 2019 10:04
URI: http://nrl.northumbria.ac.uk/id/eprint/38271

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics


Policies: NRL Policies | NRL University Deposit Policy | NRL Deposit Licence